Last week I posted a puzzle, and then a variation on it, trying to set the context for a short post I wanted to write about a curious property from number theory. I waited for a few days to allow readers to post their solutions, and now it’s time to share what I originally wanted to write about. It’s not a a very sophisticated concept, but I find it interesting and attractive.
The original puzzle asked for a simple method to determine if a large number (334,912,740,121,562) is a perfect square (). All the answers that were posted on the comments of that post pointed out that the last digit of
was always going to be the same as the square of the last digit of
. Following that logic, it is easy to show that the last digit of
has to be 0, 1, 4, 9, 6 or 5, and since the number in question does not end in any of these numbers, then it is not a perfect square.
The variation of the puzzle asked the same question about another number (334,912,740,121,560), this time ending in zero. However, the same reasoning does not apply here given that ending in 0, 1, 4, 5, 6 or 9 is only a necessary condition and does not suffice to establish whether the number is indeed a perfect square. Since this particular number ends in zero, there had to be another way to check. What now?
{ 4 comentarios }
Last revised on 2011/04/02


